For code reviewers
Review the change, not just the diff.
LGTY reconstructs what a pull request actually does, affects, and intends — grounded in your code and its production reality — so your attention goes to judgment.
Less archaeology, more judgment.
A diff shows what text changed. Reviewers spend most of their time reconstructing what it means, affects, and intends. LGTY does that reconstruction — with a receipt on every claim.
One brief per pull request, that deepens by change class
Change Analysis
What the change actually does behaviorally, who calls it (a "who calls this" map with file:line receipts), and where the code diverges from what the PR description claims. Works on any PR, day one, with no integration.
Production Impact
The runtime blast radius, joined from production: live downstream consumers ranked by real traffic, what is still on the old behavior, and a migration’s lock class, row estimate, and rollback. Read-only metadata — it declares its own coverage, so absence is never read as an all-clear.
Visual Review
The rendered screen, before and after, across the states a change affects. For frontend pull requests, review what the user actually sees instead of the code that produces it.
Grounded in production reality
An LLM over a diff — and a reviewer’s own coding agent — can only see the repository. LGTY joins the change to what production actually does: the live consumers, the real traffic, the schema. An agent can’t fake a production fact.
Every item carries a receipt you can check in seconds. Model judgment is marked as judgment. Where LGTY can’t see, it says so — it declares its own coverage, and never lets absence read as an all-clear. It attaches evidence and residual unknowns; it does not certify correctness.